Following two unsuccessful bids for the House speaker position, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) is contemplating an alternative approach to the race, as a third round of voting seems to be a certain defeat.
- Meeting Participants: Rep. Jim Jordan met with Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry (R-NC), former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), and a few aides to discuss potential strategies.
- Proposed Resolution: The resolution under consideration would expand McHenry’s powers until January, with McHenry continuing to back Jordan as speaker-designate.
- House Freedom Caucus Stance: Many members, including those from the House Freedom Caucus, have expressed reservations about expanding McHenry’s powers.
During a meeting on Wednesday night, Jordan and other key Republican figures discussed a resolution that has gained traction among those skeptical of Jordan’s leadership. This resolution would see an expansion of McHenry’s powers through January, in exchange for McHenry’s continued support of Jordan as the speaker-designate. This move would allow Jordan to be integrated into the leadership, testing his capabilities through various events and fundraisers.
The proposed plan would position Jordan for a third speaker vote in January, should he remain as the speaker-designate. This strategy would also enable Jordan to sidestep a formal concession of defeat, especially as the House GOP is currently leaderless and in a state of upheaval.
However, the plan faces challenges. Several of Jordan’s staunchest supporters, particularly from the House Freedom Caucus, have shown reluctance towards the idea of enhancing McHenry’s powers. To pass the McHenry plan, support from the Democratic Party would be essential, especially if more than four Republicans oppose it. While Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME) has expressed potential support for the plan, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has not provided a definitive stance.
|For Further Reading||The role of the House Speaker is pivotal in the U.S. political landscape, responsible for leading the House of Representatives and setting its legislative agenda. The selection process, often influenced by internal party dynamics and broader political considerations, can be contentious and politically charged. [Wikipedia]|
What is the main proposal being discussed for Rep. Jim Jordan?
The proposal involves expanding Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry’s powers until January, with McHenry continuing to support Jordan as the speaker-designate.
How have members of the House Freedom Caucus responded to the proposal?
Many members of the House Freedom Caucus have shown reluctance towards the idea of enhancing McHenry’s powers.
What are the implications if the McHenry plan is adopted?
If adopted, the plan would position Jordan for a third speaker vote in January and allow him to avoid a formal concession of defeat.
Original article source: Washington Examiner