Search Underway for Missing F-35 Fighter Jet After Pilot Ejects Over South Carolina

Urgent Search for Lost $150 Million F-35 Fighter Jet

Military officials are seeking public assistance in locating a missing F-35 fighter jet after the Marine pilot was forced to eject while flying over South Carolina. The pilot, based at the Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, survived the ejection and was found alive. However, the whereabouts of the $150 million warplane remain unknown.

Facts of the News
The missing F-35 was last seen over North Charleston
The pilot ejected safely and was found alive
The search focuses around Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, north of Joint Base Charleston

The incident occurred while the jet was flying over South Carolina, and the pilot managed to parachute to the ground safely. The pilot of another fighter jet accompanying the missing jet landed safely at Joint Base Charleston. The search operation is focusing on the areas around Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, situated to the north of the joint base.

The joint base is collaborating with the Marine Corps and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the search efforts. The public has been urged to report any information on the jet’s whereabouts to the Base Defense Operations Center. This incident marks the sixth class-A accident in the current fiscal year, defined as an event involving over £1,721,060 in damages or a fatality.

Several units of the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing are housed at the Marine Corps Air Station at Beaufort, which is located about 35 miles southwest of Charleston. The station, which spans 6,900 acres, is home to 4,700 military personnel and includes a massive combat area for air defense testing. It also features a ground-to-air combat area situated in Georgia’s McIntosh County.

Class-A Accident Defined
A class-A accident in the military refers to an incident that results in a fatality or damages exceeding a certain financial threshold, which is currently set at over £1,721,060. These accidents are the most severe category in the military’s classification of accidents. Learn more about class-A accidents on Wikipedia.

What is known about the pilot who ejected from the missing jet?

The pilot who ejected from the missing F-35 fighter jet is based at the Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort. After ejecting, the pilot parachuted safely to the ground and was found alive. He was then transported to a nearby medical center for treatment. The pilot’s current condition has not been disclosed.

What efforts are being made to locate the missing jet?

The search for the missing jet involves collaboration between the Marine Corps, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and Joint Base Charleston. The search is focusing on the areas around Lake Moultrie and Lake Marion, north of the joint base. The public has been urged to report any information they may have to assist in locating the jet.

What is a class-A accident, and how does this incident relate?

This incident is classified as a class-A accident, which refers to an event involving a fatality or damages exceeding £1,721,060. It is the sixth such accident in the current fiscal year. Class-A accidents represent the most severe category in the military’s classification of accidents, involving substantial financial loss or loss of life.

Source: Mirror

Trump Remains Silent on His Actions During the Capitol Riot in Recent Interview

Trump Withholds Details of His Actions on January 6, 2021

In a recent interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former President Donald Trump declined to share details about his actions and whereabouts during the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. Trump, who is currently leading in the polls for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, remained silent on whether he watched the events unfold on television and the calls he made during the riot.

Facts of the News
Trump refuses to disclose his actions during the Capitol riot
The interview marked Kristen Welker’s debut as the host of “Meet the Press”
Trump considers pardoning some individuals charged in relation to the riot

During the interview, which took place at Trump’s golf club in New Jersey, the former president avoided answering questions about his actions on the day of the riot, stating that he would “tell people later at an appropriate time.” Despite former aides claiming that Trump watched the riot from a dining room at the White House, rewinding and rewatching some parts, Trump did not confirm this information.

Trump also discussed other topics, including his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his stance on the recent abortion ban signed by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He expressed appreciation for Putin’s praise regarding Trump’s willingness to negotiate an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine if re-elected. Regarding the abortion ban, Trump criticized DeSantis, calling the move a “terrible mistake,” and emphasized that the number of weeks is a more crucial factor than a federal ban.

Furthermore, Trump revealed that he might consider pardoning some of the individuals charged in connection with the riot, stating, “I’m going to look at them, and I certainly might if I think it’s appropriate.” Over 1,000 people have faced federal charges due to their involvement in the riot, with more than 600 either pleading guilty or being convicted.

Capitol Riot Defined
The Capitol riot refers to the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, by a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump. The rioters were attempting to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election. The event led to deaths, injuries, and significant damage to the Capitol building. Learn more about the Capitol riot on Wikipedia.

What did Trump say about his actions on the day of the Capitol riot?

During the interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Donald Trump repeatedly declined to share details about his actions and the calls he made on the day of the Capitol riot. He mentioned that he would disclose the information “later at an appropriate time,” without specifying when that would be.

What is Trump’s stance on the recent abortion ban signed by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis?

Donald Trump criticized Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for signing a ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, calling it a “terrible mistake.” Trump emphasized that the number of weeks should be a more critical consideration in abortion laws, and he is indifferent to whether abortion rights are determined federally or at the state level.

What did Trump say regarding the possibility of pardoning individuals charged in connection with the Capitol riot?

Trump revealed that he is considering the possibility of pardoning some individuals charged due to their involvement in the Capitol riot. He stated that he would assess each case and might grant pardons if he deems it appropriate. Over 1,000 people have faced federal charges related to the riot, with many having pleaded guilty or been convicted.

Source: ABC News

Trump Advocates for Mental Competency Tests over Age Limits for Presidential Candidates

Trump Speaks on Age and Competency in Presidential Elections

In a recent interview with NBC News, Donald Trump, aged 77, expressed that he does not support imposing an age limit for presidential candidates. However, he strongly advocates for mental competency tests, emphasizing cognitive function over age. This stance comes as a critique of Joe Biden, who, at 80, is the oldest individual ever elected as president.

Facts of the News
Donald Trump opposes age limits for presidential candidates
Trump supports mental competency tests for presidential hopefuls
77% of Americans, including 69% of Democrats, believe Biden is too old for a second term

Trump, who is considering running for the presidency again, stated that age should not be a determining factor, pointing out that many successful world leaders have been in their 80s. He emphasized his belief in the importance of mental competency tests, recalling that he aced a 10-minute mental evaluation designed to screen for mild cognitive impairment or early dementia during his presidency.

Despite the constitutional challenges that might arise from imposing such tests, Trump expressed his support for them, stating, “I frankly think testing would be a good thing.” This perspective comes amidst concerns over Biden’s age and perceived mental decline, with recent polls indicating that a significant portion of Americans, including Democrats, believe Biden is too old to serve a second term.

While Biden has faced scrutiny over his age and a series of gaffes, Trump has not been exempt from making errors himself. In a recent appearance in Washington DC, Trump mistakenly stated that Biden would lead the US into World War Two and claimed he was leading Barack Obama in the polls, despite Obama being ineligible for re-election.

Cognitive Impairment Defined
Cognitive impairment refers to a decline in cognitive functions such as memory and thinking skills. It can range from mild to severe and is often seen in older adults, potentially affecting their ability to perform daily activities. Learn more about cognitive impairment on Wikipedia.

What is Donald Trump’s stance on age limits for presidential candidates?

Donald Trump does not support the imposition of age limits for presidential candidates. In a recent interview with NBC News, he emphasized that cognitive function should be a more significant consideration than age, advocating for mental competency tests for individuals aspiring to become president.

What kind of test did Trump undergo during his presidency?

During his presidency, Donald Trump underwent a 10-minute mental evaluation designed to screen for mild cognitive impairment or early dementia. The test was conducted at Walter Reed hospital, and Trump mentioned that he “aced” it, getting everything right. He believes such tests should be compulsory for presidential candidates to ensure mental fitness.

How do the American people perceive Joe Biden’s ability to serve a second term given his age?

Recent polls have shown that a considerable portion of the American populace, including a majority of Democrats, have concerns about Joe Biden serving a second term due to his age. A poll last month revealed that 77% of Americans, including 69% of Democrats, believe Biden is too old to run for a second term. Biden’s age and a series of gaffes have raised questions about his fitness for the presidency.

Source: Daily Mail

Tragic Fall from U.S.-Mexico Border Wall Results in Woman’s Death

Woman Dies in a Fall from the U.S.-Mexico Border Wall, Raising Concerns Over Border Safety

A tragic incident unfolded at the U.S.-Mexico border wall in Otay Mesa, California, where a woman lost her life after falling from the structure. The event took place around 2:30 p.m. on a Friday, as reported by FOX 5 San Diego. The woman managed to climb a 17-foot tall wall but fell from a secondary 30-foot tall barrier, resulting in her death. The alarming increase in such accidents has raised serious concerns regarding the safety measures at the border.

Facts of the News
The woman fell from a 30-foot tall secondary wall at the U.S.-Mexico border
Fatal and significant injuries have increased by 162% in the last three years since the erection of the 30-foot border wall
The incident took place in Otay Mesa, California

Immigration volunteer organizer, Pedro Rios, expressed his concerns over the increasing number of traumatic life-altering injuries and deaths resulting from falls at the border. According to the Mexican Consulate, there has been a 162% increase in fatal and significant injuries in the last three years since the 30-foot border wall was erected. Rios noted that while it was anticipated that such falls would act as a deterrent, it has not been the case, and people continue to risk their lives.

The incident sheds light on the grave risks individuals are willing to take in their pursuit of crossing the border. The Border Patrol agents in San Diego have been grappling with a surge of migrants in the area, leading to the release of hundreds of illegal immigrants onto city streets. The situation is further exacerbated by the mass releases happening in other states, including Arizona.

As cities like New York and Chicago struggle to cope with the influx of migrants, the crisis threatens to escalate further. New York City Mayor Eric Adams warned that the city is on the verge of being “destroyed” as it deals with over 110,000 migrant arrivals since the last year. The tragic death of the woman at the border wall remains under investigation, highlighting the urgent need for improved safety measures at the border.

Border Wall Defined
The U.S.-Mexico border wall is a series of vertical barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border aimed at preventing illegal crossings from Mexico into the United States. The wall varies in height, with the tallest sections reaching up to 30 feet. Learn more about the U.S.-Mexico border wall on Wikipedia.

What is the current state of border safety following this incident?

The recent tragic death of a woman who fell from the U.S.-Mexico border wall has raised serious concerns about border safety. The incident, which is still under investigation, highlights the urgent need for enhanced safety measures to prevent such life-threatening accidents. The alarming increase in fatal and significant injuries over the last three years calls for immediate attention to the issue.

What are the statistics regarding injuries and deaths at the border?

According to the Mexican Consulate, there has been a 162% increase in fatal and significant injuries in the last three years since the erection of the 30-foot border wall. This data points to a severe safety crisis at the border, with individuals facing life-altering injuries and, in tragic cases like this recent one, losing their lives.

How are cities in the U.S. coping with the influx of migrants?

Cities like New York and Chicago are facing immense challenges in coping with the influx of migrants. New York City, in particular, is grappling with a crisis, with Mayor Eric Adams warning that the city is on the brink of destruction due to the overwhelming number of migrant arrivals, which exceeded 110,000 since last year. The situation necessitates a comprehensive approach to address the migrant crisis effectively.

Source: Fox News

Fatal Shooting Near Sexyy Red’s Music Video Set in Florida: What We Know

Shooting Near Sexyy Red’s Video Set Results in One Fatality and One Injury

A tragic incident unfolded near the music video set of rapper Sexyy Red in Florida, leaving one person dead and another hospitalized. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the connection between the shooting and the video shoot.

  • Incident Details: The shooting occurred on Thursday night near the 3100 block of W. Oakland Park Boulevard, close to the Oakland Park Flea Market. The authorities received a call about the shooting shortly before 8 p.m.
  • Casualties: Upon arrival, deputies found two individuals with gunshot wounds; one was pronounced dead at the scene, while the other was rushed to a hospital for treatment. The identities of the victims have not been disclosed.
  • Sexyy Red’s Statement: The rapper clarified on Instagram that the shooting took place across the street from her video set at a gas station and not on the set itself. She extended her condolences to the family of the deceased and wished recovery for the injured.
Quick Facts Details
Current Investigation The Broward County Sheriff’s Office is actively investigating to ascertain if the shooting had any connection to the video shoot.
Sexyy Red’s Career The 25-year-old rapper from St. Louis recently topped the Billboard’s new chart ranking songs based on TikTok performance with her track “SkeeYee.” She has also been nominated for the best breakthrough artist at the BET Hip Hop awards.
Witness Information Authorities are urging anyone with information regarding the incident to contact Broward Crime Stoppers at 954-493-TIPS.

The Broward County Sheriff’s Office is delving deeper to understand if there is any link between the shooting and the video shoot happening nearby. The rapper emphasized that despite the tragic event, they managed to finish the shoot at a different location and ensured everyone from their team reached home safely.

Sexyy Red, whose career is on a rising trajectory with recent accolades including a number one spot on Billboard’s new TikTok chart and a nomination at the BET Hip Hop awards, found herself amidst this tragic event that has left many questions unanswered.

Billboard Chart Defined
Billboard charts are used to rank the sales, streams, or airplay of songs and albums in the United States. The rankings are published by Billboard, a publication and music popularity chart covering the music business. The new chart introduced by Billboard ranks songs based on their performance on TikTok. Learn more about it on Wikipedia.

What is the significance of the Billboard chart?

The Billboard chart is a significant metric in the music industry, ranking songs and albums based on various factors including sales, streams, and airplay. The new chart introduced by Billboard specifically ranks songs based on their performance on TikTok, highlighting the growing influence of the platform in the music industry.

What details have been released about the victims?

As of now, the authorities have not released detailed information about the victims. Two individuals were found with gunshot wounds; one succumbed to the injuries and was pronounced dead at the scene, while the other was hospitalized. The investigation is ongoing, and the identities of the victims remain undisclosed.

How has Sexyy Red responded to the incident?

Sexyy Red took to Instagram to clarify that the shooting did not occur on her video set but at a gas station across the street. She expressed her condolences to the family of the deceased and sent prayers for the recovery of the injured individual. She emphasized that the shooting was unrelated to her video shoot, a statement that is currently under investigation by the Broward County Sheriff’s Office.

Source: NBC News

Alleged Secret Affair between Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski Unveiled

DailyMail.com Sheds Light on Alleged Secret Relationship between Prominent Political Figures

A recent investigation by DailyMail.com has brought to light an alleged secret affair between South Dakota governor Kristi Noem and Trump advisor Corey Lewandowski. The report, based on multiple sources and evidence of numerous joint trips and appearances, suggests that the relationship has been ongoing for several years, potentially since 2019. Both individuals are married, and the revelation comes at a critical time, especially considering Noem’s potential candidacy as Donald Trump’s running mate in the upcoming presidential election.

  • Alleged Affair: The relationship reportedly began around 2019.
  • Investigation Details: The report cites multiple sources and presents detailed accounts of their joint appearances.
  • Political Repercussions: The revelation threatens Noem’s political future and her potential role in the upcoming presidential election.
Quick Facts Details
Public Appearances Both have been seen together at various political events, maintaining a careful public distance recently.
Previous Rumors Rumors surfaced as early as 2021, which were dismissed by Noem.
Response to Allegations Neither Noem nor Lewandowski denied the affair when approached by DailyMail.com.

The investigation brings forth witness accounts and details of their appearances together at various events, including campaign trails and book promotions. Despite previous rumors and Lewandowski’s history of controversies, the association continued, with Noem even rehiring him as a political advisor in 2022.

The detailed revelations might significantly affect Noem’s political image, given her strong stance on family values and traditional marriage. The report suggests that efforts were made to keep the relationship hidden from family members, including Noem’s husband, Bryon. The unfolding story opens up a series of questions regarding the future of Noem’s political career and the dynamics of the upcoming presidential election.

Clandestine Affair Defined
A clandestine affair refers to a secret relationship that is kept hidden from the public eye, often involving individuals who have a significant other. Such affairs can have serious repercussions, especially for public figures, as they can lead to a loss of trust and damage to their reputation. Learn more about the implications and dynamics of clandestine affairs on Wikipedia.

The alleged affair between Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski, as revealed by the DailyMail.com investigation, has the potential to shake the political landscape, especially in the context of the upcoming presidential elections. It remains to be seen how this revelation will be received by the public and how it will affect Noem’s political trajectory.

Source: DailyMail.com

Artworks Believed to be Stolen During Holocaust Seized from US Museums

US Museums Face Seizure of Egon Schiele Artworks Over Holocaust Theft Claims

Three artworks by Austrian expressionist Egon Schiele, believed to have been stolen during the Holocaust from Jewish art collector and entertainer Fritz Grünbaum, have been seized from museums in three different US states. The seizure was executed by New York law enforcement authorities on Wednesday, following warrants issued by the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg.

  • Artworks owner: Fritz Grünbaum, a Jewish art collector and entertainer.
  • Seized from: The Art Institute of Chicago, the Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh, and the Allen Memorial Art Museum at Oberlin College in Ohio.
  • Artworks value: Ranging from $1m to $1.5m.
Quick Facts Details
Artworks Details “Russian War Prisoner”, “Portrait of a Man”, and “Girl With Black Hair”
Previous Owner Fritz Grünbaum, died in Dachau concentration camp in 1941
Current Litigation Grünbaum’s heirs have filed civil claims for the return of the artworks

The artworks were previously owned by Fritz Grünbaum, a well-known cabaret performer and songwriter in Vienna and Berlin before the rise of Adolf Hitler. Grünbaum, who openly challenged the Nazi authorities in his work, was arrested in 1938 and later died in the Dachau concentration camp in 1941. The seized artworks include “Russian War Prisoner”, “Portrait of a Man”, and “Girl With Black Hair”, valued between $1m and $1.5m.

Grünbaum’s heirs believe that he was forced to relinquish ownership of his artworks under duress. The ongoing civil litigation on behalf of his heirs seeks the return of these artworks, among others from the collection Grünbaum began assembling in the 1920s. The Manhattan prosecutors argue they have jurisdiction over the cases as the artworks were handled by Manhattan art dealers at some point.

Egon Schiele Defined
Egon Schiele was a prominent Austrian painter and a major figure in the expressionist movement. His work is known for its intensity and raw sexuality. Schiele’s art often explored the human form and sexuality. Learn more about Egon Schiele on Wikipedia.

The seizure of the artworks believed to be stolen during the Holocaust highlights the complex and painful history surrounding art looted during this period. It brings to the fore the ongoing efforts to restore such artworks to the rightful heirs, a process that is both legally intricate and emotionally charged. The case underscores the critical role of due diligence in art transactions and the moral imperative to address historical injustices.

Source: The Guardian

Lemur Gives Springfield Police a Chase Before Being Safely Rescued

A Daring Escape and a Fluffy Fugitive: Lemur on the Loose in Springfield

In a rather unusual turn of events, Springfield police found themselves chasing a lemur through a public park. The small primate had escaped and was giving the officers a hard time as it sprinted and weaved through various obstacles including a parking lot, sidewalk, and around trees. The chase, which was captured on police body-camera, saw the officers equipped with nothing but a large towel trying to nab the speedy little creature.

  • Escape artist: A lemur with distinctive black-and-white banded tail.
  • Location: A public park in Springfield, Missouri.
  • Rescue gear: A large towel.
Quick Facts Details
Native Habitat Madagascar, off the south-east coast of the African mainland
Current Residence Connected with a local wildlife rescue agency in Springfield
City Ordinance Bans the keeping of wild animals as pets

The lemur, native to Madagascar, had been reported missing by its Springfield owners. However, due to a city ordinance that bans the keeping of wild animals as pets, the owners will not be able to reclaim it. The lemur is now connected with a local wildlife rescue agency where it will be “well cared for and loved,” according to the Springfield police department.

The chase ended with one officer managing to grab the lemur and hold it still while another wrapped it up snugly in the towel. This incident highlights the importance of adhering to local regulations that prohibit the keeping of wild animals as pets, ensuring the safety and well-being of both the animals and the community.

Lemur Defined
Lemurs are a type of primate known for their large, round reflective eyes and wailing calls that can be heard for miles. Native to Madagascar, they are recognized by their distinctive black-and-white banded tail. Lemurs are social creatures, living in groups led by a dominant female. Learn more about lemurs on Wikipedia.

This light-hearted incident brought a smile to many and showcased the Springfield police department’s commitment to ensuring the safety of all, be it humans or lemurs. It also serves as a reminder to adhere to local regulations concerning pet ownership to safeguard the well-being of animals and the community.

Source: The Guardian

Christie Foresees Trump Utilizing DOJ Against Political Rivals if Re-elected

Chris Christie Predicts Trump’s Use of DOJ Against Political Adversaries in Potential Future Term

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie expressed his belief that Donald Trump, if re-elected, would employ the Department of Justice (DOJ) to target his political adversaries. This statement came in response to Trump’s remarks at a rally where he hinted at the possibility of using the DOJ to indict a political opponent.

  • Trump’s recent rally remarks hint at the use of DOJ against political rivals.
  • Christie bases his prediction on Trump’s post-2020 election conduct.
  • Trump faces multiple indictments in various jurisdictions.

During an appearance on CNN This Morning, Christie was questioned about Trump’s comments at a rally where the former president entertained the idea of leveraging the DOJ to indict a political challenger. While Trump accused current President Joe Biden of engaging in such practices, Christie asserted that Trump might indeed resort to using the DOJ to retaliate against his political enemies, albeit not in the exact context mentioned at the rally.

Christie emphasized that his prediction stems from Trump’s “conduct” following the 2020 presidential election, during which Trump allegedly attempted to utilize the Justice Department to overturn the election results. He referred to Trump’s intention to appoint Jeffrey Clark to facilitate this endeavor. Christie stated, “given what his conduct was in the aftermath of the election, it’s not only plausible but likely” that Trump would use the DOJ against political rivals.

Trump, who has been indicted four times this year on various charges in different jurisdictions, consistently denies the allegations, labeling them as “election interference” on Biden’s part. He has termed the indictments as a “witch hunt” and pleaded not guilty to all the charges, which range from alleged falsification of business records to purported attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Quick Facts Details
Speaker Chris Christie
Context CNN This Morning Interview
Trump’s Recent Remarks Hinted at using DOJ against political opponents
Christie’s Basis for Prediction Trump’s actions post the 2020 election
Trump’s Current Legal Status Facing multiple indictments

Christie’s remarks spotlight the contentious political landscape and the ongoing speculation surrounding Trump’s potential candidacy in the 2024 elections. It raises questions about the extent to which political leaders might go to secure their positions and target adversaries. As the political narrative unfolds, the focus remains on the actions and strategies that prominent figures like Trump might adopt in the lead-up to the next presidential election.

Source: Washington Examiner

Ted Cruz Advocates for Dr. Fauci to Face Perjury Charges Over COVID-19 Origin Statements

Ted Cruz Calls for Legal Action Against Dr. Fauci for Allegedly Lying to Congress

Senator Ted Cruz has voiced his belief that Dr. Anthony Fauci should be charged with perjury for allegedly “lying under oath” to Congress regarding the origins of COVID-19. Cruz expressed his views at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), emphasizing the recent developments that point towards the virus’s potential lab origin.

  • Recent reports suggest COVID-19 might have originated from a lab in China.
  • Fauci has consistently dismissed the lab-leak theory, advocating for a natural origin.
  • Cruz criticizes the Biden administration’s DOJ for being “lawless” and not taking action against Fauci.

During his speech at CPAC, Cruz highlighted the recent report by the Wall Street Journal, which cited the Department of Energy’s belief that COVID-19 likely originated from a laboratory in China. Cruz lambasted Fauci, the former chief medical advisor to President Biden, accusing him of deliberately lying to the American public and undermining trust in the scientific community. “There has been no person who has done more to destroy trust in the scientific and medical community than Dr. Anthony Fauci,” Cruz told the audience.

Fauci, who retired at the end of last year, has long opposed the lab-leak theory, at times referring to it as a “shiny object that will go away in time.” He maintained that the virus most probably transmitted from an animal species to humans. Despite the mounting evidence and changing narratives, Fauci asserted that it was “molecularly impossible” for the virus strains studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to evolve into the virus causing the pandemic. The Republicans have also accused him of lying about the extent of funding the National Institutes of Health provided to the Wuhan laboratory for gain-of-function research.

Cruz expressed skepticism about the Biden administration’s Justice Department holding Fauci accountable, describing it as a “lawless” entity. However, he assured that the Republican-led House would investigate Fauci to uncover the alleged misinformation and corruption. Cruz emphasized the necessity to hold individuals accountable for misleading the public, promising to utilize the Republican majority in the House to investigate Fauci’s actions thoroughly.

Quick Facts Details
Speaker Ted Cruz
Event Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)
Fauci’s Position on Virus Origin Advocated for a natural origin
Recent Reports on Virus Origin Point towards a potential lab origin in China
Republican House’s Plan To investigate Fauci’s statements and actions

The remarks by Cruz add fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the origins of COVID-19, a topic that has seen shifting narratives and evolving scientific viewpoints. As investigations continue and new evidence emerges, the call for accountability grows louder, with prominent figures like Cruz urging for a thorough examination of the statements made by health officials during the pandemic. The situation underscores the complex and contentious nature of the discourse on the pandemic’s origins, highlighting the need for transparency and truth in the public sphere.

Source: NY Post

Pelosi Dismisses Claims of Setting Impeachment Precedent as ‘Hogwash’

Pelosi Refutes Accusations of Establishing an Impeachment Precedent

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected the notion that she established a precedent for impeachment processes, labeling such claims as “hogwash” during a recent interview on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

  • 2019 impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump initiated by Pelosi.
  • Recent inquiry announced by Speaker Kevin McCarthy against President Joe Biden.
  • Pelosi emphasizes the necessity to act based on facts.

In 2019, while serving as the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi initiated the first impeachment inquiry against then-President Donald Trump before a formal vote was called. This week, the current Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, announced an inquiry against President Joe Biden, citing the “precedent” set by Pelosi as the basis for his action. Pelosi, however, dismissed this rationale, stating that it was “hogwash” and urged the media to stop repeating it. She emphasized the importance of acting upon facts, noting that she had assigned six committee chairs to develop the facts before announcing the inquiry.

Pelosi further explained that she had chosen Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, to lead the inquiry, bypassing the usual route through the Judiciary Committee chaired by Rep. Jerry Nadler. She advised handling impeachment inquiries “with care and not on impulse,” asserting that she had a well-prepared case against Trump at the time of her 2019 announcement. Pelosi criticized the House Republicans for launching the current inquiry “on the basis of nothing,” urging them to take responsibility for their actions and not to misrepresent the careful approach she had taken previously.

The new impeachment inquiry initiated by McCarthy aims to scrutinize President Joe Biden’s business dealings with his son Hunter Biden and other family members. Pelosi defended her previous actions, highlighting the respect she had for the institution and the meticulous approach to addressing what she perceived as “high crimes and misdemeanors” committed by Donald Trump.

Quick Facts Details
Speaker in 2019 Nancy Pelosi
Current Speaker Kevin McCarthy
Recent Inquiry Target President Joe Biden
Focus of New Inquiry Biden’s business dealings with family members
Pelosi’s View on Precedent Claims ‘Hogwash’

The ongoing discourse around the impeachment inquiries underscores the deep political divides and the contentious nature of the impeachment process itself. As Pelosi and McCarthy spar over the alleged precedent, it brings to light the intricate dynamics of political decision-making and the role of the impeachment process in holding leaders accountable. The unfolding events promise to keep the nation tuned in, as the inquiry into President Biden’s dealings takes center stage in the coming days.

Source: Washington Examiner

Trump Considers Self-Pardon Unlikely if Re-elected in 2024

Trump Discusses Possibility of Self-Pardon in Exclusive Interview

In an exclusive interview with NBC “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker, former President Donald Trump stated that it is “very unlikely” he would pardon himself if he wins another term in 2024, asserting that he did nothing wrong.

  • Trump faces four indictments from efforts to overturn the 2020 election and other charges.
  • Interview to air on Sunday on NBC affiliates across the country.
  • Trump criticizes the justice system, alleging a bias in favor of President Joe Biden’s allies.

Donald Trump, who is currently the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, has faced four indictments in various courts, including federal courts in Washington, D.C. and Florida, and state courts in Georgia and New York. The charges stem from his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, retention of classified documents post his defeat, and payments made to porn actress Stormy Daniels. Despite the charges, Trump maintains that he did nothing wrong, questioning, “You mean because I challenge an election, they want to put me in jail?”

The interview, conducted at Trump’s Bedminster golf club in New Jersey, also touched upon the debate surrounding the question of self-pardon during the end of his first term. Trump recalled that he had the option to pardon himself, with some attorneys suggesting it. However, he chose not to, stating, “The last thing I’d ever do is give myself a pardon.” He criticized the charges against him as “fake” and expressed regret over not availing a pardon to save himself from legal troubles.

Furthermore, Trump did not completely rule out the possibility of a self-pardon in the future, leaving it open-ended. He also discussed the recent indictment of Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, emphasizing a disparity in the justice system, which he perceives as being more lenient towards Biden’s allies. Trump referred to a plea deal Hunter Biden had earlier this year as “the deal of the century.”

Quick Facts Details
Interviewer Kristen Welker (NBC “Meet the Press” moderator)
Location of Interview Bedminster golf club, New Jersey
Trump’s Stance on Self-Pardon Very unlikely but not ruled out
Indictments Faced by Trump Four, including efforts to overturn the 2020 election
Comments on Hunter Biden’s Case Criticizes the justice system for alleged bias

The interview sheds light on Trump’s perspective on the legal challenges he faces and his views on the justice system. It brings to the forefront the contentious issue of self-pardon, a topic that has been a point of discussion since his first term. As Trump remains a significant figure in the political landscape, his statements and decisions continue to hold substantial weight, influencing public discourse and potentially shaping the dynamics of the upcoming 2024 elections.

Source: NBC News

Hunter Biden Faces Federal Indictment on Gun Charges

Breaking: Hunter Biden Indicted on Gun Charges

Federal prosecutors have indicted Hunter Biden, son of U.S. President Joe Biden, on gun charges, escalating a years-long probe into Hunter Biden’s activities.

  • Indictment includes three counts related to gun possession while using narcotics.
  • Two of the counts could lead to a maximum prison sentence of 10 years each.
  • The case is overseen by special counsel David Weiss, appointed by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.

The indictment, unsealed on Thursday in a Delaware federal court, includes three counts tied to the possession of a gun while using narcotics. Two of the counts are related to Biden allegedly falsifying information on a federal form during the purchase of a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018. The third count accuses him of possessing a firearm while using a narcotic.

According to the indictment, Biden certified on a federally mandated form “that he was not an unlawful user of, and addicted to, any stimulant, narcotic drug, and any other controlled substance, when in fact, as he knew, that statement was false and fictitious.” This serious allegation comes amidst a turbulent political climate, with the House Republicans launching an impeachment inquiry seeking bank records and other documents from the president and his son.

The case is being overseen by special counsel David Weiss, a Trump appointee retained due to the sensitive nature of investigating a president’s son. The White House has directed requests for comments to the Justice Department and Hunter Biden’s legal team. Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, criticized the charges as politically influenced and unwarranted, vowing to demonstrate their baselessness in court.

Quick Facts Details
Indictment Date Thursday, September 2023
Charges Three counts related to gun possession while using narcotics
Potential Sentence Up to 10 years in prison for two counts, up to 5 years for one count
Legal Representation for Hunter Biden Abbe Lowell
Special Counsel David Weiss

The indictment against Hunter Biden marks a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny of his financial and personal affairs. It reflects the heightened tensions and partisan divides in the current U.S. political landscape. The unfolding case promises to be a focal point in the national discourse, with potential implications for the Biden administration. As the legal proceedings advance, it remains to be seen how this case will shape the public perception of the Biden family and the broader political dynamics in the country.

Trump Asserts Biden’s Incompetence, Not Age, is the Issue

Trump Speaks on Biden’s Capability to Serve Another Term

In a recent interview, Donald Trump shares his perspective on Joe Biden’s ability to govern for another term, focusing on competence rather than age.

  • Trump acknowledges the sharpness of many individuals in their 80s and 90s.
  • References Winston Churchill’s leadership until the age of 80.
  • Emphasizes Biden’s incompetence over his age as a barrier to effective governance.

In a SiriusXM interview with Megyn Kelly, Donald Trump dismissed the notion that Joe Biden, currently 80, is too old to serve another term as president. Trump, who is 77, argued that age is not the primary concern; rather, it is Biden’s ‘gross incompetence’ that stands in the way. He noted that he knows many individuals in their 80s and even 90s who are ‘sharp as a tack.’

Trump cited the example of Winston Churchill, who served as the UK Prime Minister until the age of 80, emphasizing that age did not hinder Churchill’s leadership. He also mentioned 94-year-old businessman Bernie Marcus as an example of an elderly individual still competent in his role. Trump stated, “You look at some of the great world leaders, they were in their 80s and they did — I mean, Churchill, so many people. They were phenomenal in their 80s.”

Despite the concerns raised by many, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, regarding the age of presidential candidates, Trump maintains that age is not a legitimate concern. He believes that there is ‘great wisdom’ to be found in older individuals, provided they maintain their sharpness. Trump criticized Biden’s competence, not just in the present, but also going back 25 years, stating that he ‘wasn’t the sharpest tack either.’

Quick Facts Details
Interview Platform SiriusXM, The Megyn Kelly Show
Biden’s Age 80 years
Trump’s Age 77 years
Public Opinion 77% of Americans believe Biden is too old for a second term
Historical Reference Winston Churchill served as PM until 80

The discussion surrounding the age of presidential candidates is a pertinent one, especially as both frontrunners for the 2024 elections are in their late 70s. Trump’s stance brings a different perspective to the table, emphasizing competence over age. As the political landscape evolves, it remains to be seen how the age factor will influence the choices and decisions of the electorate in the coming elections.

Source: Daily Mail