Latest
Election

Mary Peltola Campaign Sues Alaska Election Officials Over Rejected Absentee and Questioned Ballots

With only hundreds of votes separating candidates in a razor-thin Senate race, Democrats ask Anchorage Superior Court to force disclosure of daily rejection lists.

Read the story
Election · Read the story
Newstro Election desk headline visual.
Newstro · Election desk
Share this story

Emergency lawsuit filed in Anchorage Superior Court

November 7, 2026 · 12:30 p.m. Alaska / 4:30 p.m. Eastern

The campaign of Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Mary Peltola has filed an emergency public records lawsuit against Alaska state election administrators, seeking court intervention to force the immediate disclosure of daily absentee and questioned ballot rejection logs as thousands of untallied ballots remain outstanding in an extraordinarily tight race.

The lawsuit, captioned Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom and filed in the Alaska Superior Court’s Third Judicial District in Anchorage, names Lieutenant Governor Nancy Dahlstrom and Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher as defendants. The campaign is demanding that election officials release detailed daily updates of the state’s absentee voter register, including the names of voters whose ballots were rejected or challenged and the specific statutory grounds for each rejection.

Attorneys for the campaign requested an expedited preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order, asserting that state officials are withholding vital public election records during the critical post-election ballot cure period.

A razor-thin Senate margin and uncounted ballots

The legal clash erupts as Alaska’s high-profile Senate contest between Peltola and two-term Republican incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan hangs in the balance. With initial in-person votes counted, Sullivan holds a lead of under 900 votes out of more than 260,000 ballots cast statewide.

Because Alaska permits absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received by November 18 (or November 23 for overseas military voters), more than 25,000 mail-in, early, and questioned ballots remain to be processed across the state’s five regional election offices. Historically, mail-in and remote village ballots in Alaska have trended heavily Democratic, giving both political parties an intense interest in every marginal envelope.

If neither candidate secures an outright 50% majority in the initial count, Alaska’s ranked-choice voting tabulations are scheduled to execute on November 20.

Public records request and voter disenfranchisement claims

In court filings, Peltola campaign attorneys argued that under the Alaska Public Records Act and Title 15 of Alaska statutes, the absentee ballot register is explicitly designated as a public record accessible to candidates and party observers.

The campaign submitted formal public records requests to Division Director Carol Beecher earlier in the week requesting electronic copies of all daily review logs. The campaign contends that without prompt access to rejected voter rosters, campaign volunteers cannot contact voters whose ballots were flagged for minor technical defects—such as a missing witness signature, an incomplete date, or mismatched identifier—to help them cure their ballots before statutory deadlines.

“Alaskans who cast lawful ballots in rural villages and urban precincts alike deserve to know if their vote is in jeopardy,” the complaint stated. “Denying access to public rejection rosters prevents voters from exercising their statutory right to cure minor clerical errors.”

State points to confidentiality and administrative burden

The Alaska Department of Law, representing the Division of Elections, filed preliminary opposition arguing that the state treats ongoing absentee ballot processing data as preliminary and confidential until regional review boards finalize their determinations.

Assistant attorneys general argued that releasing rolling, unverified lists of challenged voters creates severe administrative burdens that would divert scarce staff resources away from opening and counting ballots. State attorneys also maintained that while credentialed party observers are allowed to watch ballot review boards in real time and inspect logs in person, state law does not mandate exporting daily voter identification databases to political campaigns.

Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman scheduled an expedited hearing for Monday morning in Anchorage to hear oral arguments on the campaign’s motion for emergency relief.

Alaska post-election ballot litigation sequence

How the legal showdown over Alaska's Senate ballots developed.

  1. Midterm election day concludes in Alaska with Dan Sullivan leading Mary Peltola by a narrow margin with thousands of ballots outstanding.
  2. Alaska Division of Elections begins regional processing of absentee, questioned, and mail-in envelopes.
  3. The Peltola campaign submits formal Alaska Public Records Act requests demanding daily lists of accepted and rejected ballots.
  4. State election officials decline to provide rolling electronic copies, citing voter confidentiality rules.
  5. Peltola campaign files emergency lawsuit in Anchorage Superior Court seeking an immediate injunction.

Where it happened: Anchorage Superior Court

The star marks the Nesbett Courthouse in downtown Anchorage, Alaska, where the emergency lawsuit was filed and will be heard.

★ Boney & Nesbett Courthouses, Anchorage, Alaska. Map data: OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL.

Legal observers and campaign reactions on X

Voting rights attorneys and political observers on X discussed the procedural rules governing Alaska’s absentee curing and ranked-choice timelines.

Open @DemocracyDocket on X for court briefs, docket filings in Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom, and analysis of Alaska election statutes.

Research and verification notes

Reporting based on the civil complaint and motions filed in Alaskans for Mary v. Dahlstrom in the Third Judicial District at Anchorage, public notices from the Alaska Division of Elections, and reporting by Democracy Docket, Washington Examiner, and KTOO Public Media.

Statutory context: Alaska election regulations require local election boards to issue written cure notifications to voters whose ballots are rejected for signature defects within 48 hours of board determination, but state law does not explicitly govern third-party campaign data exports during ongoing canvasses.